Archive | January, 2013

Rambling of the Day: Bang, bang – time to talk guns!

23 Jan

362px-Minute_Man_Statue_Lexington_Massachusetts_cropped

Woohoo, it’s Second Amendment time! I’m talking about guns today, people, so get on board or get over it.

First off, I don’t own a gun. I might someday, but I don’t right now. So this rant has nothing to do with me personally wanting to retain a weapon.

Secondly, I want to dispel one argument right off the bat, because I hear it all the time and it drives me completely insane. The Second Amendment has NOTHING to do with hunting. Stop posing the argument: Why do you need more than a few bullets in your magazine to shoot a deer? There is not a single clause in the Constitution that talks about hunting. Our gun rights are not to ensure that we can hunt as we please. They are specifically there for our protection – get this – against government.

Here’s the actual text if you need to brush up:

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. (Second Amendment)

Like that? A militia is necessary to the security of a free state. But what’s a militia, and why did the writers of the Bill of Rights think it necessary to the freedom of the people? A militia is defined as an irregular army – non-professional fighters who are citizens but not soldiers. Why would an irregular army of non-professional armed citizens be necessary to having a free state?

Oh, those Founders. Always thinking ahead. Maybe it’s because they realized that one of the very first steps tyrannical governments take when they want to control their populace is to come after their weapons. Maybe they realized that the quickest way to control the people and limit their freedoms is to leave them helpless to defend themselves.

Okay, so the Second Amendment isn’t about hunting. But if guns are meant to protect you against the government, then why can’t you have a shoulder-launch missile or hand grenades like the military does? If you have to protect yourself against the government, who controls the military, how are you going to do that with your rifle or handgun? Okay, obviously citizens are not going to have the same level of weaponry as the military. The point is not to be armed with the same things the military is armed with – the point is to pose a threat. Meaning the government would have to think twice before forcing us out of our homes and relocating us to internment camps or what have you, because they would have to consider the fact that they have an armed populace that would not come quietly. (This is just a scenario – I don’t see internment camps in the government’s near future plans.)

Our gun rights come second in our Bill of Rights only to freedom of speech, religion, assembly, press and petition. The writers of our country’s earliest, most important documents knew the importance of this right. They knew that these rights were necessary to the security of a free state. Perhaps our leaders in government need to be reminded of this. Perhaps they should stop aiming their initiatives at law-abiding gun owners and crack down on enforcing laws that are already in place. Perhaps we should look at where most of the shootings happen in our country before we rush to new gun control measurements. Seems logical, right? But that would be counterproductive for the gun-grabbers in Washington. They don’t want truthful statistics, like this one:

With just one single exception, the attack on congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords in Tucson in 2011, every public shooting since at least 1950 in the U.S. in which more than three people have been killed has taken place where citizens are not allowed to carry guns. (National Review)

And they would have to explain why Chicago, with some of the tightest gun laws in the country, isn’t the safest place in the country. They would have to question if the 513 homicides in Chicago last year alone – more than allied losses in Afghanistan – might have something to do with that. They might have to… think.

Photo: Minute_Man_Statue_Lexington_Massachusetts.jpg: w:User:Daderot

Rambling of the Day: Change begins with us

6 Jan

It has been three weeks since we heard the news of the shooting in Connecticut, and I still wake up thinking about it everyday. I get up in the middle of the night to make sure my daughter is where she is supposed to be. I get close to her face so I can hear her even breathing. I check and recheck on her. My heart sinks when I have to leave her somewhere without me.

Because the world is not safe for her. It is not just all a big playground at her disposal. The world is complicated. It is dangerous. There are people in it that would hurt her if given the chance.

These thoughts attack me in the middle of the night. They haunt me when I drop her off at preschool or leave her for an hour in the classroom at church. No matter how much I protect my child, she is not safe 100% of the time.

Many Americans are awakening to these same thoughts, and we are all searching for answers. We are looking at the data and digging up the studies in desperate hope that we can find the culprit behind the violence plaguing our nation. The president is talking about guns. In an ironic display of pseudo heroism, Hollywood actors have come out against guns. The manufacturers of violence think guns are the problem.

Anyone who knows me knows I obviously don’t blame guns for what happened in Newtown. But the left-right argument that goes something like, “It’s guns!” – “No, it’s not guns!” has reached a laughable level. These people are talking around the problem.

I’ve come to a place where I am almost resigned about it. I know that Hollywood and Washington will continue to talk around the problem. They will continue to sign petty non-effective bills into law and pat themselves on the back for their heroism. I am speaking nonpartisanly, too – no one in Washington will get to the root of the problem. They are the talking heads – the ones that assure us of their good intentions as they stuff their legislation with payoffs to their lobbyists. I have tuned out of the conversation they are having about this issue because I know what I’m going to hear even before I turn up the volume. It’s white noise, dead air, coming out of those talking heads. They won’t do their research. They won’t get to the bottom of anything.

Our culture has become violent, and it has become incredibly self-centered. We are losing our children. We are losing their attention to screens and to voices that are not our own. They are being instilled with values that we would never in a million years dream of teaching them – but there’s nothing we can do. At least, that’s what I’ve heard. We can’t stop them from seeing commercials for shows where people’s heads are being blown off. We can’t shield their eyes from magazine covers and billboards glorifying sex and degrading the sanctity of the body. We have to just live with the fact that this is our world now and this is how our children will grow up.

Oh, please. Anyone who wants to make that argument to me does not know me. They don’t know the strength and determination of good people in this country and around the world who simply will not stand for accepting the status quo. We will do our research. We’ll prove that there is a direct correlation between what our kids are being indoctrinated with through their culture and the violence that is escalating around us. And we’ll show the world that we don’t have to just accept that our kids will grow up glorifying violence and degradation. We’ll prove that we can instill in them the value that life is sacred, and that they must treat each other with respect.

Washington thinks it starts with them. They think the answer lies in passing the right gun laws – that somehow they will put fear into criminals by making their crimes more illegal. Common sense would have us all laugh at such a notion, but that’s what they think. We know better. We know it starts with us. It starts in our homes, with our kids. It starts with a conversation with the parents of our kids’ friends. It starts with mutual agreements between us about what is and is not acceptable for our children to be exposed to. It starts with us.

We can’t end violence. We can’t eliminate evil from our nation. If someone wants to hurt our children, gun laws will not stop him from doing so. But we have to do something. Our world did not become the way it is overnight. We got here so gradually that we could not have predicted fifty years ago what would be allowed on cable television. It’s not irreversible, though. The damage is not irreparable. We have to demand change – not simply from our law books, but from our culture.

Check out the website http://takethechallengenow.net/. It’s a really interesting idea that has actually proven to be very successful where it has been implemented. The site also has some really useful scientific research that is definitely worth a peek. 

The Ugly Volvo

Attempts at Adulthood

Nathan Hancock

Probably not a waste of your time.

The Matt Walsh Blog

Absolute Truths (and alpaca grooming tips)

All We Are

Updates and a look behind the scenes of the non-profit organization

I A N W A T T

Creative Director

Lean Fit and Healthy Forever

One Guys Journey to Fitness

JOY IN THE DAY

Home of Glitter and Leg Warmers

twitchy.com

Who Said What

Elisabeth Akinwale

Athletics, Motherhood and Other SuperFantastic Subjects

Dyslexia Parents Guide

A parents journey into dyslexia

Honest Food with Amy

Changing my lifestyle, one recipe at a time!

Egg Whites Only Please

With Cheese. And Bacon. On a Bagel. Oh gosh, I love bagels (as long as they're Gluten Free).

Parenting And Stuff

Not a "how to be a great parent" blog

64 EATS

Good eats along I-64 in Virginia and a few beyond!

365 Days of Bacon

Every day. Bacon-fied.